Rep on HUB 3.6 Covering Case Check In

Please complete this training survey: Rep on HUB 3.6 Covering Case Check In

Rep 3.6 Covering Case (1): Share your understanding of why symptoms modified by medications are not reliable to include in a rubric set for repertorization.

Rep 3.6 Covering Case (2): Reflecting on an earlier check in about the meaning of words, give an example of how a homeopath's conjecture about the client's symptom could lead the repertorization off track.

Rep 3.6 Covering Case (3): Share your understanding of the impact of very large rubric sets (with 20-30 rubrics) for a case repertorization.

Rep 3.6 Covering Case (4): Explain how the information in a case might be substantially different, depending on whether the homeopath conducted a review of body systems (like Hahnemann did) in addition to the client's volunteered report.

Rep 3.6 Covering Case (5): In the example case of the woman with recurrent bronchitis, the comparison of the 4 different example rubric sets

was confusing, all of them looked like adequate rubric sets to me

was overly obvious, and the example was not a useful teaching for me

was helpful, demonstrating the strengths and weaknesses of a rubric set

was very useful, improving my rubric set content and balance

Rep 3.6 Covering Case (6): Estimated time to complete lessons 3.5 and 3.6 is about 5 hours. Actual time you spent was

Less time

Close to estimated time

Longer time